Analysis of Dis/agreement - with particular reference to Law and Legal Theory

Specificaties
Paperback, 610 blz. | Engels
Springer Netherlands | 0e druk, 2010
ISBN13: 9789048163700
Rubricering
Springer Netherlands 0e druk, 2010 9789048163700
Onderdeel van serie Law and Philosophy Library
Verwachte levertijd ongeveer 9 werkdagen

Samenvatting

In order to determine whether two participants in a discussion are in real dis/agreement, one must compare their propositions. Comparison presupposes yardsticks in common. This work thematises such yardsticks, in that it demonstrates the existence, content and factual significance of a relatively well-delimited set of proposition types and proposition patterns, with their accompanying tenability criteria and motivating interests. It is for philosophers, legal theorists, lawyers, and linguists.

Specificaties

ISBN13:9789048163700
Taal:Engels
Bindwijze:paperback
Aantal pagina's:610
Uitgever:Springer Netherlands
Druk:0

Inhoudsopgave

Preface to the English edition. Preface to the Norwegian edition. Some symbols and conventions used in the text. I. Introduction. II. Some Fundamental Types of Proposition about What something is. A. Survey. B. Definitions. C. Characterisations. D. Analytically Un/true Propositions. E. Separating. F. Fusion of Descriptive and Normative Propositions. The Concepts of 'Descriptive Proposition' and 'Normative Proposition' as Concepts of Degree. G. No Corresponding Fusion of Definitions and Characterisations. H. Interplay. III. Topics from the Assessment of Tenability. IV. Some Forms of Language and Argumentation that often Make it Unclear which Type of Proposition One is Confronted with; in Particular on the Flight from the Normative Proposition. V. Reconstruction and Redefinition: A Distinct and Widespread Combination of the Fundamental Proposition Types. Conclusion. Literature referred to. Index of authors. Index of subjects.

Rubrieken

Populaire producten

    Personen

      Trefwoorden

        Analysis of Dis/agreement - with particular reference to Law and Legal Theory