<p>I. Introduction and key resources.-<br>1. Nanotechnology, the brain, and the future: Anticipatory governance via end-to-end real-time technology assessment<br>Jason Scott Robert, Ira Bennett, and Clark A. Miller.-<br><br>2. The complex cognitive systems manifesto<br>Richard P. W. Loosemore.-<br><br>3. Analysis of bibliometric data for research at the intersection of nanotechnology and neuroscience<br>Christina Nulle, Clark A. Miller, Harmeet Singh, and Alan Porter.-<br>4. Public attitudes toward nanotechnology-enabled human enhancement in the United States<br>Sean Hays, Michael Cobb, and Clark A. Miller.-<br><br>5. U.S. news coverage of neuroscience nanotechnology: How U.S. newspapers have covered neuroscience nanotechnology during the last decade<br>Doo-Hun Choi, Anthony Dudo, and Dietram Scheufele.-<br><br>6. Nanoethics and the brain<br>Valerye Milleson.-<br><br>7. Nanotechnology and religion: A dialogue<br>Tobie Milford.-<br><br>II. Brain repair.-<br><br>8. The age of neuroelectronics<br>Adam Keiper .-<br><br>9. Cochlear implants and Deaf culture<br>Derrick Anderson.-<br><br>10. Healing the blind: Attitudes of blind people toward technologies to cure blindness<br>Arielle Silverman.-<br><br>11. Ethical, legal and social aspects of brain-implants using nano-scale materials and techniques<br>Francois Berger et al. .-<br><br>12. Nanotechnology, the brain, and personal identity<br>Stephanie Naufel.-<br><br>III. Brain enhancement.-<br><br>13. Narratives of intelligence: the sociotechnical context of cognitive enhancement<br>Sean Hays.-<br><br>14. Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy<br>Henry T. Greeley et al. .-<br><br>15. The opposite of human enhancement: Nanotechnology and the blind chicken debate<br>Paul B. Thompson .-<br><br>16. Anticipatory governance of human enhancement: The National Citizens’ Technology Forum<br/>Patrick Hamlett, Michael Cobb, and David Guston<br>a. Arizona site report<br>b. California site report<br>c. Colorado site reportd. Georgia site report<br>e. New Hampshire site report<br>f. Wisconsin site report.-<br><br>IV. Brain damage.-<br><br>17. A review of nanoparticle functionality and toxicity on the central nervous system<br>Yang et al. .-<br><br>18. Recommendations for a municipal health and safety policy for nanomaterials: A Report to the City of Cambridge City Manager<br>Sam Lipson .-<br><br>19. Museum of Science Nanotechnology Forum lets participants be the judge<br>Mark Griffin .-<br><br>20. Nanotechnology policy and citizen engagement in Cambridge, Massachusetts: Local reflexive governance<br>Shannon Conley.-<br></p>
