Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review

Comparative Perspectives

Specificaties
Gebonden, 445 blz. | Engels
Springer | 1e druk, 2019
ISBN13: 9783030315382
Rubricering
Springer 1e druk, 2019 9783030315382
Verwachte levertijd ongeveer 9 werkdagen

Samenvatting

This book investigates judicial deference to the administration in judicial review, a concept and legal practice that can be found to a greater or lesser degree in every constitutional system. In each system, deference functions differently, because the positioning of the judiciary with regard to the separation of powers, the role of the courts as a mechanism of checks and balances, and the scope of judicial review differ. In addition, the way deference works within the constitutional system itself is complex, multi-faceted and often covert. Although judicial deference to the administration is a topical theme in comparative administrative law, a general examination of national systems is still lacking. As such, a theoretical and empirical review is called for.

Accordingly, this book presents national reports from 15 jurisdictions, ranging from Argentina, Canada and the US, to the EU. Constituting the outcome of the 20th General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law, held in Fukuoka, Japan in July 2018, it offers a valuable and unique resource for the study of comparative administrative law.

Specificaties

ISBN13:9783030315382
Taal:Engels
Bindwijze:gebonden
Aantal pagina's:445
Uitgever:Springer
Druk:1
Verschijningsdatum:24-11-2019
Hoofdrubriek:Juridisch

Inhoudsopgave

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives
Zhu, Guobin

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Argentina
Aberastury, Pedro

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Australia
Kingham, Fleur

Comparer la déférence judiciaire : regards canadiens vers l’extérieur
Lambert, Nicolas

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in China
Gao, Qinwei

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in the Czech Republic
Kühn, Zdenek (et al.)

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Denmark
Mortensen, Bent Ole Gram (et al.)

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: The European Union
Eliantonio, Mariolina

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Finland
Mäenpää, Olli

A Principled Approach to Judicial Deference for Hong Kong
Chan, Cora

Judicial Deference to the Administration in Israel
Cohn, Margit

Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Italy: Beyond Deference?
della Cananea, Giacinto

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review in Japan
Kawagishi, Norikazu

Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review: The Case of the Netherlands
Barkhuysen, Tom (et al.)

The “Dreadful Truth” and Transparent Fictions: Deference in New Zealand Administrative Law
Hopkins, W. John

Deference to the Public Administration in Judicial Review: A Polish Perspective
Kmieciak, Zbigniew (et al.)

‘The Notion of a Subjective or Unfettered Discretion is Contrary to the Rule of Law’: Judicial Review of Administrative Action in Singapore
Tan, Eugene K. B.

Full Judicial Review or Administrative Discretion? A Swedish Perspective on Deference to the Administration
Wenander, Henrik

Judicial Deference to the Administration in the United States
Reitz, John C.

Rubrieken

Populaire producten

    Personen

      Trefwoorden

        Deference to the Administration in Judicial Review